Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Four-fermion production near the W pair production threshold

Martin Beneke, Pietro Falgari, Christian Schwinn, Adrian Signer, Giulia Zanderighi

TL;DR

This work develops and applies unstable-particle effective field theory to four-fermion production near the W-pair threshold, aiming for a precision determination of the W mass. By organizing corrections into resonant production/decay operators and non-resonant four-fermion operators, and by treating hard, soft, collinear, and Coulomb effects at NLO, the authors achieve a robust prediction for the cross section near threshold. A careful treatment of initial-state radiation reveals ISR as the dominant theoretical uncertainty, while the EFT calculation yields an MW sensitivity of approximately 10–15 MeV, reducible to around 5 MeV with the full NLO four-fermion result. The results agree well with full NLO four-fermion calculations and demonstrate the viability of a systematic, analytic EFT approach for unstable-particle processes at colliders.

Abstract

We perform a dedicated study of the four-fermion production process e- e+ -> mu- nubar_mu u dbar X near the W pair-production threshold in view of the importance of this process for a precise measurement of the W boson mass. Accurate theoretical predictions for this process require a systematic treatment of finite-width effects. We use unstable-particle effective field theory (EFT) to perform an expansion in the coupling constants, GammaW/MW, and the non-relativistic velocity v of the W boson up to next-to-leading order in GammaW/MW ~ alpha_ew ~ v^2. We find that the dominant theoretical uncertainty in MW is currently due to an incomplete treatment of initial-state radiation. The remaining uncertainty of the NLO EFT calculation translates into delta MW ~ 10-15 MeV, and to about 5 MeV with additional input from the NLO four-fermion calculation in the full theory.

Four-fermion production near the W pair production threshold

TL;DR

This work develops and applies unstable-particle effective field theory to four-fermion production near the W-pair threshold, aiming for a precision determination of the W mass. By organizing corrections into resonant production/decay operators and non-resonant four-fermion operators, and by treating hard, soft, collinear, and Coulomb effects at NLO, the authors achieve a robust prediction for the cross section near threshold. A careful treatment of initial-state radiation reveals ISR as the dominant theoretical uncertainty, while the EFT calculation yields an MW sensitivity of approximately 10–15 MeV, reducible to around 5 MeV with the full NLO four-fermion result. The results agree well with full NLO four-fermion calculations and demonstrate the viability of a systematic, analytic EFT approach for unstable-particle processes at colliders.

Abstract

We perform a dedicated study of the four-fermion production process e- e+ -> mu- nubar_mu u dbar X near the W pair-production threshold in view of the importance of this process for a precise measurement of the W boson mass. Accurate theoretical predictions for this process require a systematic treatment of finite-width effects. We use unstable-particle effective field theory (EFT) to perform an expansion in the coupling constants, GammaW/MW, and the non-relativistic velocity v of the W boson up to next-to-leading order in GammaW/MW ~ alpha_ew ~ v^2. We find that the dominant theoretical uncertainty in MW is currently due to an incomplete treatment of initial-state radiation. The remaining uncertainty of the NLO EFT calculation translates into delta MW ~ 10-15 MeV, and to about 5 MeV with additional input from the NLO four-fermion calculation in the full theory.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 43 sections, 116 equations, 12 figures, 5 tables.

Figures (12)

  • Figure 1: Diagrams contributing to the tree-level matching of ${\cal O}_p^{(0)}$.
  • Figure 2: Leading-order effective-theory diagram for the forward-scattering amplitude.
  • Figure 3: Cut one-loop diagrams contributing to non-resonant production-decay operator matching.
  • Figure 4: Example of a two-loop diagram with one hard and one potential loop. Cut (2) is part of the Born cross section, but subleading as discussed in the text.
  • Figure 5: Two-loop cut diagrams. Symmetric diagrams are not shown.
  • ...and 7 more figures