Multistart Large Neighborhood Search for the liquefied natural gas transportation and trading over long-term time horizons
S. Iudin, M. Veshchezerova, K. Tsarova, G. Tadumadze, V. Shete, J. -K. Hao, M. Perelshtein
TL;DR
This work addresses LNG transportation and trading over multi-year horizons, where a heterogeneous vessel fleet, LNG sloshing, and speed- and load-dependent consumption create a highly complex planning problem. The authors propose a three-component Large Neighborhood Search framework: (i) a Big-pairs arc-flow MILP to generate a strong initial plan, (ii) a Small discharges MILP to insert mid-route, lower-volume contracts, and (iii) a tensor-train guided black-box optimizer (TetraOpt) to tune penalty parameters that steer the search toward high-profit regions. The approach yields substantial profit gains over baseline models (e.g., about 35% on production data) with only modest runtime overhead, and it effectively exploits contract flexibility and multi-destination opportunities. The methodology integrates two staged MILPs with a black-box search and is supported by a visualization tool for solution understanding, suggesting practical potential as a decision-support system in LNG trading and shipping.
Abstract
Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) transportation is a critical component of the energy industry. It enables the efficient and large-scale movement of natural gas across vast distances by converting it into a liquid form, thereby addressing global demand and connecting suppliers with consumers. In this study, we present the Multistart Large Neighborhood Search heuristic for the LNG transportation problem, which involves hundreds of contracts and a planning horizon of two to three years. Our model incorporates several fuel types, LNG sloshing in the tank, and speed- and load-dependent consumption rates. We also consider flexible contracts with LNG volume variability, enabling volume optimizations and multiple discharges. A tensor-train optimizer defines the parameters of Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) models, allowing better solution space exploration. On the historic and artificially generated data, our approach outperforms the baseline linear-programming model by 35% and 44%, respectively, while the time overhead is only several minutes.
